Risk 01
OT/IT convergence exposure
Shared network paths between office systems, SCADA, and PLC jump hosts allow an IT compromise to reach production dependencies.
Loading page…
Manufacturing & industrial
Unpatched PLC jump hosts and weak OT/IT segmentation can turn a vendor-access incident into a production-line stoppage.
Plant managers and IT leads share one view of line-adjacent systems, vendor access, patch debt, and incident aging without exposing the OT network to office tooling.
Risk 01
Shared network paths between office systems, SCADA, and PLC jump hosts allow an IT compromise to reach production dependencies.
Risk 02
Persistent vendor VPN accounts and unowned maintenance sessions leave engineering systems exposed between scheduled interventions.
Risk 03
MES, historians, industrial Wi-Fi, and ERP dependencies can halt a shift while office monitoring still appears healthy.
Your Workspace Control Plane connects each operating risk to an accountable owner, a reviewable action, and the evidence needed to close the loop.
Response 01
Record OT/IT boundaries and jump-host ownership, prioritize segmentation gaps, and coordinate approved maintenance windows with plant leadership.
Response 02
Track named integrator approvals, access windows, and revocation evidence with an owner for each plant and maintenance activity.
Response 03
Link production-critical assets to incident records, route line-impacting failures to the plant escalation path, and retain recovery and rollback evidence.
Plant asset records, vendor approvals, and maintenance metadata use PostgreSQL with authenticated company scope and role-based access. MongoDB holds the separate publishing workload. This keeps plant service evidence within its tenant boundary while production control traffic, PLC logic, and supplier-controlled data remain in designated plant systems.
Operational records
PostgreSQL · organization-scoped work and audit evidence
Publishing content
MongoDB · separately managed articles and guidance
Evidence collection and control reviews mapped to the obligations in your operating scope.
Map critical assets, segmentation actions, incident ownership, and recovery exercises to the plant’s cybersecurity risk program.
For applicable defense work, coordinate assessment scope, access evidence, and remediation ownership with the supplier’s compliance lead.
Retain change approvals, maintenance records, and corrective-action ownership for the organization’s selected management-system controls.
Documented deployment pattern
An architectural pattern built around manufacturing operating requirements.
01
Site & workforce
Named users, managed endpoints, and scoped vendor access.
02
Company & role boundary
Authenticated organization context and role checks govern access.
03
Operational evidence
Scoped tickets, approvals, and review records support the audit trail.
Planning targets for the scoped operating model. Confirm coverage and measurement windows during discovery; contractual commitments are set in the service agreement.
Next step
Bring your site count, critical workflows, and compliance requirements. We will map the controls, evidence, and operating targets to your environment.
Scoped to your environment
Site count, compliance load, and current tooling shape the plan instead of a package tier.
Senior operators on the call
You talk with the people who run the control planes, not a qualification script.
Audit, architecture, or both
Start where the risk actually is. The first conversation stays practical.