Risk 01
CUI access-control gaps
Engineering and subcontractor accounts can retain enclave access after their project role changes or authorization ends.
Loading page…
Defense & aerospace
CUI access exceptions, stale POA&M ownership, and missing assessment evidence can put defense contract readiness at risk.
Program managers see POA&M status, MFA coverage, CUI access exceptions, and patch evidence in one governed workspace.
Risk 01
Engineering and subcontractor accounts can retain enclave access after their project role changes or authorization ends.
Risk 02
Unowned findings and expired milestones obscure the actual status of remediation between readiness reviews.
Risk 03
Patch records, MFA coverage, and access-review evidence fall out of date while engineering teams focus on contract delivery.
Your Workspace Control Plane connects each operating risk to an accountable owner, a reviewable action, and the evidence needed to close the loop.
Response 01
Coordinate enclave access approvals and removals with authorized program owners, recording decisions without transferring CUI into service records.
Response 02
Assign each tracked control gap an owner and due date, and maintain review actions with references to evidence in the approved assessment repository.
Response 03
Schedule control-evidence reviews, track missing artifacts, and coordinate readiness work against the contract’s defined assessment scope.
Non-CUI service metadata and remediation ownership are scoped to the authenticated company and permitted roles in PostgreSQL, separate from MongoDB publishing content. Tenant isolation supports controlled coordination of readiness work. CUI and assessment artifacts remain in designated, separately scoped repositories and enclaves.
Operational records
PostgreSQL · organization-scoped work and audit evidence
Publishing content
MongoDB · separately managed articles and guidance
Evidence collection and control reviews mapped to the obligations in your operating scope.
Coordinate scope, readiness actions, and evidence ownership for the applicable assessment level with the organization’s assessment lead.
Map access, patching, and logging remediation to the applicable requirements and track evidence references in approved repositories.
Track contract-specific CMMC assessment and affirmation milestones with the responsible contracts and compliance owners.
Documented deployment pattern
An architectural pattern built around defense operating requirements.
01
Site & workforce
Named users, managed endpoints, and scoped vendor access.
02
Company & role boundary
Authenticated organization context and role checks govern access.
03
Operational evidence
Scoped tickets, approvals, and review records support the audit trail.
Planning targets for the scoped operating model. Confirm coverage and measurement windows during discovery; contractual commitments are set in the service agreement.
Next step
Bring your site count, critical workflows, and compliance requirements. We will map the controls, evidence, and operating targets to your environment.
Scoped to your environment
Site count, compliance load, and current tooling shape the plan instead of a package tier.
Senior operators on the call
You talk with the people who run the control planes, not a qualification script.
Audit, architecture, or both
Start where the risk actually is. The first conversation stays practical.